Total
1149 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-31872 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Verify Access | 2025-01-28 | 7.5 High |
| IBM Security Verify Access Appliance 10.0.0 through 10.0.7 could allow a malicious actor to conduct a man in the middle attack when deploying Open Source scripts due to missing certificate validation. IBM X-Force ID: 287316. | ||||
| CVE-2024-31871 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Verify Access | 2025-01-28 | 7.5 High |
| IBM Security Verify Access Appliance 10.0.0 through 10.0.7 could allow a malicious actor to conduct a man in the middle attack when deploying Python scripts due to improper certificate validation. IBM X-Force ID: 287306. | ||||
| CVE-2024-30020 | 1 Microsoft | 14 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 11 more | 2025-01-28 | 8.1 High |
| Windows Cryptographic Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-35299 | 1 Jetbrains | 1 Youtrack | 2025-01-28 | 5.9 Medium |
| In JetBrains YouTrack before 2024.1.29548 the SMTPS protocol communication lacked proper certificate hostname validation | ||||
| CVE-2023-23901 | 1 Seiko-sol | 4 Skybridge Basic Mb-a130, Skybridge Basic Mb-a130 Firmware, Skybridge Mb-a200 and 1 more | 2025-01-28 | 4.8 Medium |
| Improper following of a certificate's chain of trust exists in SkyBridge MB-A200 firmware Ver. 01.00.05 and earlier, and SkyBridge BASIC MB-A130 firmware Ver. 1.4.1 and earlier, which may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to eavesdrop on or alter the communication sent to the WebUI of the product. | ||||
| CVE-2024-35140 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Verify Access Docker | 2025-01-27 | 7.7 High |
| IBM Security Verify Access Docker 10.0.0 through 10.0.6 could allow a local user to escalate their privileges due to improper certificate validation. IBM X-Force ID: 292416. | ||||
| CVE-2023-38009 | 1 Ibm | 1 Cognos Analytics Mobile | 2025-01-27 | 4.2 Medium |
| IBM Cognos Mobile Client 1.1 iOS may be vulnerable to information disclosure through man in the middle techniques due to the lack of certificate pinning. | ||||
| CVE-2023-27823 | 1 Optoma | 1 1080pstx | 2025-01-24 | 9.8 Critical |
| An authentication bypass in Optoma 1080PSTX C02 allows an attacker to access the administration console without valid credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2023-31151 | 1 Selinc | 20 Sel-2241 Rtac Module, Sel-2241 Rtac Module Firmware, Sel-3350 and 17 more | 2025-01-24 | 4.7 Medium |
| An Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in the Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories Real-Time Automation Controller (SEL RTAC) Web Interface could allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to conduct a man-in-the-middle (MitM) attack. See SEL Service Bulletin dated 2022-11-15 for more details. | ||||
| CVE-2023-32994 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Saml Single Sign On | 2025-01-23 | 3.7 Low |
| Jenkins SAML Single Sign On(SSO) Plugin 2.1.0 and earlier unconditionally disables SSL/TLS certificate validation for connections to miniOrange or the configured IdP to retrieve SAML metadata, which could be abused using a man-in-the-middle attack to intercept these connections. | ||||
| CVE-2024-42186 | 2025-01-23 | 2.8 Low | ||
| BigFix Patch Download Plug-ins are affected by an insecure protocol support. The application can allow improper handling of SSL certificates validation. | ||||
| CVE-2024-29050 | 1 Microsoft | 13 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 10 more | 2025-01-23 | 8.4 High |
| Windows Cryptographic Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2022-45457 | 2 Acronis, Microsoft | 3 Agent, Cyber Protect, Windows | 2025-01-22 | 7.5 High |
| Sensitive information disclosure and manipulation due to improper certification validation. The following products are affected: Acronis Agent (Windows) before build 29633, Acronis Cyber Protect 15 (Windows) before build 30984. | ||||
| CVE-2022-45458 | 4 Acronis, Apple, Linux and 1 more | 5 Agent, Cyber Protect, Macos and 2 more | 2025-01-22 | 7.5 High |
| Sensitive information disclosure and manipulation due to improper certification validation. The following products are affected: Acronis Agent (Windows, macOS, Linux) before build 29633, Acronis Cyber Protect 15 (Windows, macOS, Linux) before build 30984. | ||||
| CVE-2023-20881 | 1 Cloudfoundry | 3 Capi-release, Cf-deployment, Loggregator-agent | 2025-01-21 | 8.1 High |
| Cloud foundry instances having CAPI version between 1.140 and 1.152.0 along with loggregator-agent v7+ may override other users syslog drain credentials if they're aware of the client certificate used for that syslog drain. This applies even if the drain has zero certs. This would allow the user to override the private key and add or modify a certificate authority used for the connection. | ||||
| CVE-2011-0199 | 1 Apple | 2 Mac Os X, Mac Os X Server | 2025-01-21 | 5.9 Medium |
| The Certificate Trust Policy component in Apple Mac OS X before 10.6.8 does not perform CRL checking for Extended Validation (EV) certificates that lack OCSP URLs, which might allow man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof an SSL server via a revoked certificate. | ||||
| CVE-2012-2993 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Windows Phone 7, Windows Phone 7 Firmware | 2025-01-16 | 5.9 Medium |
| Microsoft Windows Phone 7 does not verify the domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) field of an X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof an SSL server for the (1) POP3, (2) IMAP, or (3) SMTP protocol via an arbitrary valid certificate. | ||||
| CVE-2023-1664 | 1 Redhat | 8 Amq Broker, Build Of Quarkus, Jboss A-mq and 5 more | 2025-01-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak. This flaw depends on a non-default configuration "Revalidate Client Certificate" to be enabled and the reverse proxy is not validating the certificate before Keycloak. Using this method an attacker may choose the certificate which will be validated by the server. If this happens and the KC_SPI_TRUSTSTORE_FILE_FILE variable is missing/misconfigured, any trustfile may be accepted with the logging information of "Cannot validate client certificate trust: Truststore not available". This may not impact availability as the attacker would have no access to the server, but consumer applications Integrity or Confidentiality may be impacted considering a possible access to them. Considering the environment is correctly set to use "Revalidate Client Certificate" this flaw is avoidable. | ||||
| CVE-2023-28321 | 6 Apple, Debian, Fedoraproject and 3 more | 17 Macos, Debian Linux, Fedora and 14 more | 2025-01-15 | 5.9 Medium |
| An improper certificate validation vulnerability exists in curl <v8.1.0 in the way it supports matching of wildcard patterns when listed as "Subject Alternative Name" in TLS server certificates. curl can be built to use its own name matching function for TLS rather than one provided by a TLS library. This private wildcard matching function would match IDN (International Domain Name) hosts incorrectly and could as a result accept patterns that otherwise should mismatch. IDN hostnames are converted to puny code before used for certificate checks. Puny coded names always start with `xn--` and should not be allowed to pattern match, but the wildcard check in curl could still check for `x*`, which would match even though the IDN name most likely contained nothing even resembling an `x`. | ||||
| CVE-2020-27648 | 1 Synology | 3 Diskstation Manager, Skynas, Skynas Firmware | 2025-01-14 | 8.3 High |
| Improper certificate validation vulnerability in OpenVPN client in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 6.2.3-25426-2 allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate. | ||||